• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
    • Marineland
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • First Amendment
    • Second Amendment
    • Third Amendment
    • Fourth Amendment
    • Fifth Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Eighth Amendment
    • 14th Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Privacy
    • Civil Rights
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Appeals Court Skeptical Of Sitting In Judgment Over Florida’s Education Standards

July 19, 2017 | FlaglerLive | Leave a Comment

It's not like judging a competition. (US Army Corps of Engineers)
It’s not like judging a competition. (US Army Corps of Engineers)

A Tallahassee-based appeals court wrestled Tuesday with what standard should be applied to Florida’s education system, with judges sounding skeptical that courts were even a proper place to hear the issue.


At least two members of a three-judge panel from the 1st District Court of Appeal directed sharp questions at Jodi Siegel, an attorney for a coalition of advocates and parents who sued the state eight years ago for allegedly failing to provide a quality education system.

While the judges questioned both sides, even Siegel conceded afterward that they seemed skeptical about courts’ ability to referee the fight.

“They did, and we hope we made our argument,” she said.

The central issue in the appeal is whether courts can evaluate the state’s obligation under a 1998 constitutional amendment that declares it is a “paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders.”

The amendment fleshed that out, in part, by saying adequate provision will be made for a “uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system” of public schools.

But Leon County Circuit Judge George Reynolds ruled last year that the judiciary should be hesitant to wade too deeply into the issue and give deference to the Legislature under the separation of powers. The judges at Tuesday’s hearing seemed more likely than not to agree.

Judge Brad Thomas pointed out to Siegel that writers of a constitutional amendment limiting class sizes set clear benchmarks for the Legislature to follow, but the Constitution Revision Commission that crafted the “paramount duty” clause did not.

“Why didn’t they put an objectively measurable stand in the text and say, you have to meet the standard?” Thomas asked.

Judge James Wolf also pushed back on Siegel’s references to the state’s own accountability system, which drives report cards issued to schools every year.

“Not everybody can be in an ‘A’ school. … Is it adequate to have every school that’s a ‘C’ school?” Wolf said.

Siegel said that, if pressed, she would suggest that 75 percent of students across the board meeting state standards would be one potential benchmark. But she also highlighted that some demographic groups and geographic areas of the state don’t do as well as others.

“We have a system in which there are such vast differences across the districts and across groups of children that we have to look to what more is needed. And that has not been analyzed by the state,” Siegel said.

Rocco Testani, a lawyer representing the state, said those kinds of standards weren’t in the amendment.

“This is not Lake Wobegon, and that’s exactly what the plaintiffs over and over again were coming up with,” Testani said. He was referring to a fictional town created by radio host Garrison Keillor where “all the children are above average.”

But the judges seemed wary of the idea that state lawmakers should be given free rein to decide what meets the terms of the amendment.

“Shouldn’t the Legislature be required to come up with standards specifically related to this constitutional amendment? Otherwise, isn’t this constitutional amendment totally useless?” Wolf asked.

Testani countered that issues about what the state should provide to schools are “inherently political questions,” and that the Constitution Revision Commission meant the amendment to be a goal that voters could measure.

“Aspirational statements are enforced at the ballot box — not in courts of law,” he said.

–Brandon Larrabee, News Service of Florida

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Scott Adie on Trump’s ‘Beautiful’ Bill Cuts $3.8 Billion from Florida’s Healthcare System, Hurting Hospitals and the Poor
  • Pogo on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Tuesday, October 14, 2025
  • where/when will this end? on Florida’s 1st Public School Chaplain Is Trump Disciple at War with Church-State Wall
  • Jane Gentile Youd on Palm Coast’s Message to Flagler Humane Society: Help Us Help You
  • Gail on Palm Coast’s Message to Flagler Humane Society: Help Us Help You
  • Willyhall on Palm Coast Man Neglects to Take Infant Daughter to Hospital After She Ingested Edibles, Attending Football Game Instead
  • Dennis C Rathsam on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Tuesday, October 14, 2025
  • celia pugliese on The Palm Coast City Manager Candidates In Their Own Words: Videos and Vision Papers
  • JMH on The Supreme Court’s Vision of Unlimited Presidential Power
  • CH on With Shutdown, Democrats Finally Take a Clear and Critical Stand
  • Ed Danko, former Vice-Mayor, PC on Palm Coast’s Message to Flagler Humane Society: Help Us Help You
  • TR on At Celebration of Life for Jorge and Nancy Salinas, a Couple’s Forever ‘Spirit and Joy’ Counter Brutality of Loss
  • Kyoshin on DeSantis Signs Warrant to Kill Bryan Jennings, Murderer of 6-Year-Old Girl, for 16th Execution of the Year
  • Dennis C Rthsam on Palm Coast’s Message to Flagler Humane Society: Help Us Help You
  • Jim on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, October 13, 2025
  • JimboXYZ on At Celebration of Life for Jorge and Nancy Salinas, a Couple’s Forever ‘Spirit and Joy’ Counter Brutality of Loss

Log in