• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Group Files Federal Suit Challenging Florida Restrictions on Felons’ Voting Rights Moments After DeSantis Signs New Law

June 29, 2019 | FlaglerLive | 13 Comments

Desmond Meade of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, one of the groups most instrumental in the passage of Amendment 4 last November. (FRRC)
Desmond Meade of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, one of the groups most instrumental in the passage of Amendment 4 last November. (FRRC)

Shortly after Gov. Ron DeSantis signed an omnibus elections bill Friday, a coalition of voting-rights and civil-rights groups announced they had filed a federal lawsuit challenging the state’s plan for carrying out a constitutional amendment designed to restore felons’ voting rights.

The 74-page lawsuit (see below), filed in Gainesville, alleges the newly signed law “unconstitutionally denies the right to vote to returning citizens with a past felony conviction based solely on their inability to pay outstanding fines, fees, or restitution.”


The complaint, which names as plaintiffs the Florida State Conference of the NAACP, the League of Women Voters of Florida, the Orange County Branch of the NAACP and several felons, also alleges the measure is unlawful “because it was motivated, at least in part, by a racially discriminatory purpose.”

A partisan firestorm erupted in the waning days of this year’s legislative session after Republicans tacked onto the elections package provisions aimed at implementing the voter-approved constitutional amendment that restores the voting rights of felons who have completed their sentences.

The addition of the provisions to implement what appeared as Amendment 4 on the November ballot quickly overshadowed many other election-related features of the bill (SB 7066).

Under the bill, felons will have to repay all of their financial obligations before their voting rights are restored.

Backers of the amendment maintain that the language — approved in a party-line vote on the final full day of the legislative session — isn’t what voters intended.

The amendment granted restoration of voting rights to felons “who have completed all terms of their sentence, including parole or probation.” The amendment excluded people “convicted of murder or a felony sexual offense.” 

Democrats and many other Amendment 4 supporters say the legislation is too restrictive and would block people from being able to vote.

“SB 7066 was never intended to follow the people’s mandate under Amendment 4,” Senate Minority Leader Audrey Gibson, D-Jacksonville, said in a statement Friday night. “It was an unnecessary bill designed for the sole purpose of permanently disenfranchising as many ex-felons as possible.”

But DeSantis appeared Friday to have grudgingly signed the measure, indicating he believes the amendment restores voting rights to some undeserving felons and doesn’t grant enough rights to others.

The amendment did not address other civil rights, such as the right to hold office or to serve on a jury, DeSantis said in a transmittal letter to Secretary of State Laurel Lee.

“I am considering whether to seek restoration of all civil rights to some of those whose rights were restored by Amendment 4. However, I would only consider restoring rights to those convicted of non-violent offenses,” the Republican governor wrote.

“Amendment 4 restores — without regard to the wishes of the victims — voting rights to violent felons, including felons convicted of attempted murder, armed robbery and kidnapping, so long as those felons completed all terms of their sentences. I think this was a mistake and would not want to compound that mistake by bestowing blanket benefits on violent offenders,” DeSantis wrote.

Under the law, felons will have to repay all restitution and all fees and fines ordered by courts, not including “any fines, fees, or costs that accrue after the date the obligation is ordered as part of the sentence.”

The financial obligations would be considered completed if they are paid in full, if a victim or the court “forgives” the restitution, or if a judge allows felons to serve community service in lieu of payment.

Black lawmakers took umbrage at the linkage between money, voting and people’s felony status, saying it is a reminder of Florida’s ugly Jim Crow-era policies aimed at keeping blacks from the ballot box.

Lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the Brennan Center for Justice filed the lawsuit Friday.

“It (the law) creates two classes of returning citizens: those who are wealthy enough to vote and those who cannot afford to,” the lawsuit said.

While the Amendment 4 issue has drawn much of the attention, other parts of the broad elections package will increase voters’ access to the polls and strengthen processes to ensure ballots are counted, Leon County Supervisor of Elections Mark Earley told The News Service of Florida.

But he acknowledged that he and his counterparts throughout the state “were a little unhappy” that bill included the Amendment 4 implementation, which he said would have been better as a stand-alone measure.

While some felons began registering to vote as early as January, the legislation has created confusion for many others who are unsure whether their financial obligations have been zeroed out and are fearful of getting in trouble, Earley said.

Under the law, felons who registered to vote between Jan. 8 and July 1 but who haven’t fulfilled their financial obligations won’t be prosecuted.

Earley urged felons who feel they’ve completed their sentences to register to vote. State elections officials will vet the voting applications and flag people who are ineligible, as is currently the process. The lists of flagged applicants are sent to county supervisors.

“Each supervisor will get information from the Department of State and we will contact them and give them a chance to let us know whether they think they’ve completed their sentencing, so we can work that out,” Earley said. “The worst that’s going to happen is they may be taken back off the rolls. But I certainly don’t want people to feel threatened or fearful about trying to get registered to vote if they were previously convicted of a felony, because unless it’s obvious intent to defraud the system, they aren’t going to be prosecuted.” 

Earley, meanwhile, extolled the portions of the new law that change the state’s vote-by-mail system after the tumultuous 2018 elections.

The new law changes from six to 10 the number of days prior to an election for voters to request that ballots be mailed to them. 

The law also allows supervisors to start counting mail-in ballots a week earlier, from 15 days to 22 days before the election. The extra time is particularly helpful for large counties with multi-page ballots, Earley said.

And the law will give voters until 5 p.m. two days after the election to “cure” signatures on mail-in ballots that don’t match signatures on file with elections offices. Voters who cast provisional ballots on Election Day will have the same benefit.

Mismatched signatures were an issue in one of the lawsuits from last year’s elections, which resulted in three statewide recounts.

“I think 7066 for the most part does help improve the election process,” Earley said. “I think it serves in a big way to improve people’s access to the polls and then get their votes counted.”

–Dara Kam, news Service of Florida

Click to access amendment-4-federal-lawsuit.pdf

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Other guy says

    June 29, 2019 at 4:47 pm

    I can’t wait to read the comment on this one….

  2. marlee says

    June 29, 2019 at 4:59 pm

    I would like to financially support this…anyone know how this support can go directly to this lawsuit effort????

  3. hawkeye says

    June 29, 2019 at 5:58 pm

    this is not a racial thing , if the person serves their sentence, including restitution ,court costs and fees and fines then they get the right to vote back, how can that possibly be considered as racist? I voted against this ,however, I accept that it passed as law, just as the people who want to regain the right to vote must accept all the steps they need to follow to be able to vote again.

  4. Concerned Citizen says

    June 29, 2019 at 10:14 pm

    What about victims rights?

    Do victims of crimes get a chance to get their non-victim status restored after being victimized? Do victims get a “do over” and start a restored normal life? We seem to worry more about felons these days. Don’t want to be a felon? Don’t committ a felony.

    I have said it before and will say it again. Sure you can have your rights restored. I have no problem with that. You should only get them back AFTER ALL sentencing requirements have been met. That includes time served, probation,fines and restitution that YOU recieved at sentencing.

  5. Flatsflyer says

    June 30, 2019 at 5:17 am

    What’s with these Republicans. Always trying to overturn the will of the people. Why do we elect people to represent us when infact they don’t do what we elect them to do? Throw these bums out of office and let them work at McDonald’s or WalMart, they might be qualified for those jobs but certainly should not be any part of our representative governmnt!

  6. Do The Right Thing says

    June 30, 2019 at 9:53 am

    As a former convicted felon at age 18, three decades gone by now, going through the ridiculous unconstitutional clemency process (via Lawton Chiles) to have my civil liberties restored, and fighting to make certain Florida follows the rules of our federal lands, and now a long-time (I)ndependent registered voter …

    I completely agree with the laws passed by the Florida legislature! It is the responsibility of ALL people to do the right thing in our country to make our country better for ALL. Complete your sentence, and that includes restitution. It doesn’t matter if you’re black, white, or purple. Complete your sentence. Do anything and everything you can to make it right with not only victims, but the courts as well.

    It is clear these civil liberty groups are swinging for the fences, and hope to at least get singles, doubles and triples out of the process, and that’s fine. But it is my opinion, someone that’s been on the “dark side”, that Florida has gotten this one right, finally.

    Understand that “convicted felon” also includes those countless white-collar crooks who have stolen gobs of money from hard working people, and even some of those crooks were politicians and/or pseudo lobbyists. We don’t want them with political powers to sway anyone anywhere until they’ve PAID their dues. Remove the emotion from the matter, and you’ll find that this is the right thing to do.

  7. C’mon man says

    June 30, 2019 at 10:46 am

    Marlee if you want to financially support this then you need to pay off fines owed by the felons trying to get their rights restored. This way their sentence is completely paid in full after they complete probation (if any)

  8. Pogo says

    June 30, 2019 at 11:26 am

    @If the Floriduh Republican party screws you out of your right to vote – listen up:

    Do every other thing you ARE able to do to kick them out of office: Give of yourself and campaign for anyone not a Republican, donate to anyone not a Republican.

    Denying Voting Rights to Felons Should Be Beneath Us
    By Nancy Smith

    “The felons’ voting-rights tug-of-war showcases the worst — the very worst — of America’s political parties. Who gets to vote should be driven by citizenship, the spirit of the United States Constitution and all America stands for, not by blowhardism and dirty tricks…”

    Read it again
    https://flaglerlive.com/138005/denying-voting-rights-to-felons/

  9. Dave says

    June 30, 2019 at 11:48 am

    Concerned Citizen, the felons in the case are the victims, and we are trying to make sure their rights are protected

    Hawkeye, it is racist because they are trying to keep the poor disenfranchised by holding their rights hostage over money they could never afford to begin with

  10. Jim says

    June 30, 2019 at 2:22 pm

    Dave- The term racist means one person treats another person different whether it is for the better or worse strictly because of a persons race. It sounds like you feel any and all policies or laws that you do not agree with is racist. Please use the word correctly

  11. really says

    June 30, 2019 at 4:52 pm

    i fail to see how race has anything to do with financial status. the poor, by my last observations were comprised of all races. financial status is not being racist by any definition i’ve researched. is everything about race?
    should any felon have their rights restored? only after their debt has been paid including financially. maybe felons and the rest of the i want it “free” society should get off their asses and work two jobs like i do to pay their debts.

  12. Richard says

    July 1, 2019 at 5:09 pm

    Typical liberals that don’t have a leg to stand on so they play the race card in hopes to get their way. Cry babies! That’s all you are.

  13. Dave says

    July 2, 2019 at 11:39 am

    Jim to try and suggest that the black population is not suffering the most from poverty is either ignorant or purposefully misdirecting. I am a white Male felon yet I easily understand that these laws are designed to keep the poor(black) community which is way over policed, disenfranchised.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Ed P on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Friday, May 9, 2025
  • Ed P on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 10, 2025
  • Lance Carroll on Without a Single Question, Bunnell Board Approves Rezoning of Nearly 1,900 Acres to Industrial, Outraging Residents
  • Lance Carroll on Without a Single Question, Bunnell Board Approves Rezoning of Nearly 1,900 Acres to Industrial, Outraging Residents
  • Ray W, on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 10, 2025
  • CJ on Palm Coast Mayor Mike Norris Thinks the FBI or CIA Is Bugging His Phone
  • Ray W, on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 10, 2025
  • Atwp on AdventHealth Hospitals Hire More than 800 Nurses in Flagler, Volusia and Lake Counties in Past Year
  • Michael on Flagler Beach Will Consider Selling Ocean Palm Golf Club to Leaseholder, With Conditional Milestones
  • Mothersworry on Palm Coast Mayor Mike Norris Thinks the FBI or CIA Is Bugging His Phone
  • Jeff Schurman on Flagler Beach Reels at Death of SunBros Café Owner Travis Sundell, 49, ‘Passionate Part of What Makes This Town Special’
  • Ray W, on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 10, 2025
  • JimboXYZ on Palm Coast Mayor Mike Norris Thinks the FBI or CIA Is Bugging His Phone
  • The Villa Beach Walker on Flagler Beach Will Consider Selling Ocean Palm Golf Club to Leaseholder, With Conditional Milestones
  • Sherry on The African Penguin May Be Extinct by 2035
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 10, 2025

Log in