No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Court Orders Re-Hearing in Death Penalty
Case Over Juror Calling Gays ‘Depraved’

| June 16, 2018

Eric K. Patrick. prejudicial gay comments juror

Eric K. Patrick.

The Florida Supreme Court on Thursday ordered resentencing for a Death Row inmate convicted of a 2005 murder in Broward County and said a separate hearing should be held to delve into anti-gay statements made by a juror.

Justices ordered a new sentencing hearing for inmate Eric Kurt Patrick because the jury split 7-5 in recommending the death penalty to a judge. On that issue, Thursday’s ruling was similar to numerous other cases in which justices have ordered resentencing based on a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that found Florida’s death-penalty sentencing system unconstitutional.

But justices also agreed that Patrick should receive an evidentiary hearing related to anti-gay statements made during jury selection by a man who ended up serving on the jury. Patrick’s current lawyers argued in a Supreme Court brief that his trial attorney did not properly seek to block the man from serving on the jury and that a new trial should result.

The Supreme Court opinion said the juror acknowledged he would have a bias if he knew a criminal defendant was gay.

“When asked if he would still hold the prosecutor to the proper burden of proof, he answered, ‘Put it this way, if I felt the person was a homosexual, I personally believe that person is morally depraved enough that he might lie, might steal, might kill,’ ” the Supreme Court opinion said. “The juror said ‘yes’ when asked if this bias might affect his deliberations.”

Patrick, now 55, was convicted in the September 2005 murder of Steven Schumacher after the men met at a park and went to Schumacher’s home. Patrick, who was homeless at the time, gave Schumacher a massage and the men were naked in bed when Patrick began beating the victim, according to a summary of the case included in the Supreme Court opinion. Patrick said Schumacher wanted to have anal sex but that Patrick refused — a situation that ultimately led to the fatal beating.

The Supreme Court opinion said Patrick denied being gay but that he had engaged in sexual activity with other men. Regardless, the Supreme Court pointed to potential bias in the statements made during the jury-selection process known as voir dire.

“Applying this evidence to the juror’s voir dire answers establishes that, by the juror’s own acknowledgement on the record, he was predisposed to believe that Patrick is morally depraved enough to have committed the charged offenses,” the opinion said. “Although Patrick does not identify as homosexual and indicated in his confession that his sexual activity with men was for material support rather than personal fulfillment, these points do not eliminate the bias that this juror said he would feel based on the evidence that trial counsel and the trial court knew the jury would hear during trial.”

The opinion said prosecutors contended that Patrick’s trial attorney did not block the juror for strategic reasons. But the Supreme Court said it can “neither ignore the possibility that counsel’s failure to challenge this juror was strategic nor conclude that it was.” As a result, justices unanimously ordered a lower court to hold an evidentiary hearing.

The Supreme Court also ruled 5-2, with justices Charles Canady and Ricky Polston dissenting, that Patrick should receive a new sentencing hearing as an outgrowth of the 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision.

That U.S. Supreme Court decision found Florida’s death-penalty sentencing system unconstitutional because it gave too much authority to judges, instead of juries. A subsequent Florida Supreme Court ruling said juries must unanimously agree on critical findings before judges can impose death sentences and must unanimously recommend the death penalty.

The Florida court Thursday applied that to Patrick’s case, pointing to the jury’s 7-5 jury recommendation for the death penalty. After the court rulings, state lawmakers changed the death-penalty sentencing system to address the unanimity issue.

–Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8 Responses for “Court Orders Re-Hearing in Death Penalty
Case Over Juror Calling Gays ‘Depraved’”

  1. Anonymous says:

    And we should have faith in the Florida Judicial System, NOT! Why has this man been sitting in jail for years for this to just now come to be? Everyone, no matter who, or what the crime, deserves a fair trial and jury and a judge that can act before it has to go to an appeal! Lower tribunal cases that go to appeal and are over turned should result in the judge in the lower tribunal case who heard the case be removed from the bench! It is a waste of tax payers money for cases as this to go to a higher court when the right thing should have been done from the get go in the lower court.

  2. Lt Frank says:

    Perhaps Florida needs LGBT Courts and LGBT judges. Now go find 12 LGBT jurors !

  3. Anonymous says:

    I could only imagine what this guy has to say about atheists.

  4. Really says:

    Until we stop giving incarcerated individuals more rights than alleged FREE citizens Political correctness will continue to bleed the antiquated system

  5. Billy says:

    So let me get this straight, the defendant is not gay but a juror has a problem with gay people, so the sentencing is overturned because of possible bias towards gay people – of which he is not one? One juror!!! Yet the recent IG report of 538 pages showing countless agents, who hate the president, making all kinds of biased statements – yet no bias was found!! What a system we have!!!!!

  6. knightwatch says:

    Really, Really? Do you not know alleged criminals have the exact same rights as FREE citizens. Our system of justice guarantees this. And our system of justice requires a fair trial with an unbiased jury. Seems you have a problem with that. Remember these words…”And then they came for me”.

  7. hawkeye says:

    gays and atheists are both depraved

  8. Born and Raised Here says:

    Obviously my christian belief on how my faith looks at homosexuality would certainly play a huge role in me serving on that jury.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in