• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Religious Charter Schools’ Fate May Hinge on Justice Roberts

May 4, 2025 | FlaglerLive | 1 Comment

public money religious charter schools
Under his eye. (© FlaglerLive)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over a Catholic virtual charter school’s bid to become the country’s first religious charter school. With Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused from the case, the outcome appeared to hinge on the vote of Chief Justice John Roberts, who asked probing questions of both sides but did not make his position clear.

The case began two years ago, when Oklahoma’s charter school board approved an application by the archdiocese of Oklahoma City and the diocese of Tulsa to establish St. Isidore of Seville, a virtual Catholic charter school. Although the state law governing charter schools requires them to be non-religious “in their programs, admissions policies, and other operations,” the board’s contract with St. Isidore provided that the school could freely exercise its religious beliefs.




Gentner Drummond, the state’s Republican attorney general, went to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, asking it to invalidate the board’s contract with St. Isidore. 

The state supreme court agreed to do so. St. Isidore, the state court ruled, is a public school and therefore required under state law to be non-religious.

Representing the Oklahoma charter school board, James Campbell told the justices that the state’s charter school program relies on private organizations to create more educational options. “Fueled by private ingenuity,” Campbell emphasized, “those schools are thriving.” And he pointed to three of the Supreme Court’s recent cases – Trinity Lutheran v. Comer, Carson v. Makin, and Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue – that, he said, stand for the proposition that when the government makes benefits or funds generally available to the public, it cannot exclude people or groups from such programs just because they are religious.

Roberts pushed back against Campbell’s reliance on the trio of cases, suggesting that those cases “involved fairly discrete state involvement.” By contrast, Roberts said, “this does strike me as a much more comprehensive involvement.”




Justice Elena Kagan agreed, telling Campbell that this case was “a fair bit different” from Carson, in which the Supreme Court struck down a Maine policy that allowed public funds to be used to pay tuition at non-sectarian schools but not at religious schools. The charter schools in this case, she said, “look like regular public schools” and are subject to the same kinds of requirements as traditional public schools – for example, they are free, they are open to everyone, they have to comply with proficiency standards, and the state can shut them down. “These are state-run institutions,” Kagan concluded.

scotus blog logoJustice Ketanji Brown Jackson also appeared dubious that the Trinity Lutheran line of cases was necessarily applicable here. In Carson, she noted, the Supreme Court ruled that a state can opt to provide a strictly secular education in its public schools. St. Isidore, she posited, is not being denied a benefit that everyone else is receiving but is instead being denied a benefit that no one else gets – the ability to establish a religious public school. Under the Supreme Court’s cases, she contended, it would have been a different story if St. Isidore wanted to establish a secular public school but its application was rejected because it is a religious institution.

Another key focus of the argument was whether St. Isidore is a private actor that has a right to the free exercise of religion or is instead a government entity or a state actor, which would not have such a right.

Representing Drummond, Gregory Garre argued that charter schools like St. Isidore have “all the hallmarks of government entities.” They are created by the state, he said – here, by the legislature under state law – and they remain under state supervision and control. The state, he maintained, exercises “extensive oversight of” charter schools’ curriculum, far more than it wields for private schools in the state. Indeed, he noted, federal law requires charter schools to operate under “public supervision and direction.” The state has designated charter schools as public entities, and the public understands them to be public schools, he said.




But Campbell pushed back on that characterization, telling the justices that St. Isidore had been created by two private organizations and is controlled by an outside board.

Justice Neil Gorsuch seemed receptive to this characterization. He later observed that if the lack of supervision by a school’s board resulted in a determination that a charter school is not a government entity, states could respond by initiating more oversight for charter schools – for example, by placing public officials on the board.

Justice Samuel Alito focused on comments made by Drummond in opposing St. Isidore’s application to open a virtual charter school, when he noted that approving St. Isidore’s application would mean that the board would also have to approve a religious charter school operated by a minority religion. You have, he told Garre, a “very serious Masterpiece Cakeshop problem,” referring to the 2018 case of a Colorado baker who refused to make a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The court issued a narrow ruling for the baker, finding that a Colorado administrative agency had been too hostile to his sincerely held religious beliefs. The opposition “reeks of hostility to” Islam, Alito stressed.

The justices also spent time exploring the implications of a ruling in either direction. Kagan described a hypothetical involving a school in a Hasidic community in New York that wanted to adopt a curriculum focused on the Talmud and other ancient texts, with instruction in Yiddish or Hebrew. Does New York have to approve this charter school, Kagan queried, even though the curriculum is “super different”? The state wanted to adopt a charter-school program to offer flexibility, but a ruling for the charter school in this case would require it to fund all kinds of religious schools if it wants to have programs at all.

Gorsuch countered that it might be a “neutral rule” to require charter schools to teach a standard curriculum that included subjects like math, science, and English.

Other justices, including Roberts, asked Garre to address the court’s decision in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, holding that the city violated the free exercise clause when it refused to enter into a contract with Catholic Social Services to place children in foster homes because of the agency’s policy of not certifying same-sex couples as foster parents.




Garre responded that the case before the court on Wednesday was “fundamentally different” from Fulton, because in that case Catholic Social Services was not funded or controlled by the state.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of the justices who was most openly sympathetic to the charter school, echoed the arguments by the school and the board that upholding the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s opinion could mean that other faith-based services, like Catholic Social Services or Catholic Charities, would also be deemed government entities and be unable to exercise their religion.

Garre again tried to distinguish St. Isidore from those kinds of services, telling Kavanaugh that the other faith-based services are not established by the state itself.

Gorsuch pressed Garre further, observing that Catholic Social Services could in fact provide adoption services only with “incredible oversight” from the city. How, Gorsuch asked, would we draw the line between faith-based services that would or would not be government entities? “We have to have a test,” Gorsuch concluded.

Toward the end of his time at the lectern, Garre told the justices that if they rule for the board and the school, it will have a “dramatic effect” on the charter-school system. It would mean, he said, that both the federal law governing charter schools and virtually all state charter-school laws would also be unconstitutional, because they require charter schools to be “non-sectarian.” Congress and state governments could adopt new laws, he acknowledged, but in the interim he contended that there would be “uncertainty, confusion, and disruption.”

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the federal law ensuring that students with disabilities receive a free appropriate public education, applies to charter schools because they are understood to be public schools, Garre continued. But that understanding could be upended by a ruling for the school and the board.

And if religious schools can qualify as public charter schools, Garre continued, it will raise questions about who can be admitted to such schools, whom the schools can hire as teachers, and what the curricula at those schools will be.

But several of the justices saw the issue before the court very differently. In Kavanaugh’s view, the religious schools weren’t asking for favoritism; they were simply seeking not to be excluded from the charter-school program based on their religion. The school and the board appeared to have four votes – Justice Clarence Thomas along with Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh. Whether the chief justice will join them to overturn the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision seems possible, but remains to be seen.

–Amy Howe, Scotus Blog

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Deborah Coffey says

    May 6, 2025 at 10:24 am

    Better not do this or we’ll all be paying our taxes for Satanist, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh, and every other religious sect in the world to have their own “charter” schools. Stick with separation of Church and State. The Catholics can afford to run their own schools…or not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Ray W, on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Tuesday, May 27, 2025
  • mm on Don’t Buy the False Narrative that Palm Coast’s Infrastructure Isn’t Keeping Up with Growth
  • Pogo on At Flagler Tiger Bay, Ex-US Attorney General Gives Bullish View of ‘Unitary’ Executive Power, With Nod to Calvin Coolidge
  • Kennan on Why the Far Right Fabricated the Myth of a Migrant ‘Invasion’
  • Sherry on Democracy’s Sunset: There’s a 70% Chance the Constitution Will Be Suspended Before 2028
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Tuesday, May 27, 2025
  • Ray W, on Why the Far Right Fabricated the Myth of a Migrant ‘Invasion’
  • Ray W, on Why the Far Right Fabricated the Myth of a Migrant ‘Invasion’
  • DaleL on No, Race Is Not a ‘Biological Reality’
  • Deborah Coffey on Why You Fall for Fake Health Information
  • The dude on Why You Fall for Fake Health Information
  • c on At Flagler Tiger Bay, Ex-US Attorney General Gives Bullish View of ‘Unitary’ Executive Power, With Nod to Calvin Coolidge
  • William Moya on At Flagler Tiger Bay, Ex-US Attorney General Gives Bullish View of ‘Unitary’ Executive Power, With Nod to Calvin Coolidge
  • James on At Flagler Tiger Bay, Ex-US Attorney General Gives Bullish View of ‘Unitary’ Executive Power, With Nod to Calvin Coolidge
  • Deborah Coffey on At Flagler Tiger Bay, Ex-US Attorney General Gives Bullish View of ‘Unitary’ Executive Power, With Nod to Calvin Coolidge
  • Deborah Coffey on Solemnity and Dissonance at Palm Coast’s Memorial Day Ceremony as Congressman Invokes 1.2 Million Casualties

Log in