No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Abortion Rights Mark Big Court Victory, But Effect on Florida Restrictions Unclear

| June 27, 2016

abortion rights florida texas

They finally win one. (Jordan Uhl)

Florida abortion providers are breathing sighs of relief following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Monday striking down a Texas law that would have greatly limited access to legal abortion in that state.

The Texas law would have required doctors to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of the clinics where they perform abortions and clinics to meet the same standards as walk-in surgical centers.

By a 5-3 vote, the justices found that neither of the provisions “offers medical benefits sufficient to justify the burdens upon access (to abortion) that each imposes,” and that each constitutes an “undue burden” on access to the procedure, violating the U.S. Constitution.

“This decision is certainly historic,” said Laura Goodhue, executive director of the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates. “This is the biggest case since Roe v. Wade in terms of its impact on access to a safe and legal procedure.”

But in Florida, supporters of recent laws requiring more stringent standards for abortion providers say the high court ruling should have no impact.

Sen. Kelli Stargel and Rep. Colleen Burton, both Lakeland Republicans, sponsored House Bill 1411, which was signed into law by Gov. Rick Scott in March. On Monday, they said the new Florida law is different from the Texas statute at issue in the Supreme Court case. Scott’s office and legislative leaders are reviewing the ruling.

Among its provisions, the new Florida law requires clinics that perform first-trimester abortions to have patient-transfer agreements with nearby hospitals, or for clinic doctors to have admitting privileges nearby. Stargel noted that the law does not include Texas’ requirement that a doctor have admitting privileges within 30 miles of an abortion clinic.

“We have reasonable proximity, which is what we’ve had in law for a very long time with regards to all other clinics, and we’re doing abortion clinics the same way,” she said.

Although the Florida law takes effect Friday, U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle on Wednesday will hear a challenge from Planned Parenthood aimed at blocking three parts of the law.

That complaint, in part, targets a section of the law that seeks to prevent state agencies, local governments and Medicaid managed-care plans from contracting with organizations, like Planned Parenthood, that own, operate or are affiliated with clinics that perform elective abortions. The complaint also challenges a provision that would require the state Agency for Health Care Administration to inspect at least 50 percent of abortion-clinic patient records each year. And it challenges a change to the way the state determines trimesters of pregnancy.

Burton, the House sponsor of HB 1411, said the three provisions had nothing to do with the Texas law. And while opponents contend the challenged provisions are medically unnecessary, Burton said she was only concerned with protecting women’s health and safety.

Tallahassee attorney Rick Johnson, local co-counsel in another challenge to a recent abortion statute, agreed that Monday’s ruling was unlikely to alter Florida law for now. He’s involved with a challenge to a 2015 law, requiring a 24-hour wait before women can obtain an abortion. That case is now before the Florida Supreme Court.

Johnson said the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of protecting access to legal abortion threatened by an “undue burden.” But in Florida, he said, stronger protections are in place — those of privacy.

“We had the intermediate appellate court, the 1st (District Court of Appeal), attempt to apply the federal ‘undue burden’ standard and find that under that standard, the 24-hour waiting period was good enough,” Johnson said. “So if (Monday’s ruling) has any impact, that will be the impact — that some of those courts that were incorrectly applying Florida law will now find that even if they apply federal law, some of those ridiculous restrictions won’t pass muster.”

Monday’s ruling drew a wide range of reactions from political candidates and activists. Florida Senate President Andy Gardiner, R-Orlando, was dismayed by those who celebrated the ruling.

“In Florida, we have championed policies and programs that promote life and provide resources for women who choose life for their babies,” Gardiner said in a statement. “Photos of people celebrating today’s ruling should disgust anyone who values the health of women and the life of their unborn children.”

Goodhue said Scott and the Legislature are unlikely to back off their efforts to limit abortion in Florida.

“We’ve seen an increase every year in the number of bills filed, but also in the extremist content of their nature,” she said. “So we’ve seen these attacks escalate, and we fully anticipate that we’ll have to continue this fight.”

–Margie Menzel, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

11 Responses for “Abortion Rights Mark Big Court Victory, But Effect on Florida Restrictions Unclear”

  1. michael murphy says:

    If I were a Woman and didn’t want to have a Baby I would use some sort of Birth Control or use the Mourning after Pill, now I really don’t care how many Abortions a Woman has as long as I am not paying for them but it just sounds more Educated to use Birth Control instead of having a Fetus pulled from my Body and Killed.I guess that $5 Condom is harder to use than a Abortion. PEACE

  2. jadobi says:

    Its not my decision what a woman decides to do. All I can say is that if you are anti-abortion, convince the woman you will take care of the child upon its birth, conversely it shouldn’t be a routine last resort for the same woman. A loved one once decided to have an abortion after thorough education. As she was leaving the facility, the demonstrators were yelling at her. Little did they know that had she tried to give birth, and the child managed to survive, the child would have had no quality of life and lived in a vegetative state. I’m neither anti or pro, simply put, I have my own things to be concerned with. We don’t have to choose a side on everything.

  3. Love Doctor says:

    A friend of mine’s girlfriend went to the doctor for an OB/GYN exam. He gave her birth control pills. She asked what was she to do with them. He told her to go home and when went to bed with her boyfriend put one between her knees before she had sex.

  4. jasonb says:

    If you want to reduce abortions, then you need to push for comprehensive sex education and easier (and cheaper) availability to contraception. Shutting down Planned Parenthood clinics will increase abortions not lessen them.

  5. Sherry says:

    HA! HA! HA! How dismissive of women’s health care. . . from an obvious chauvinist! Love Doctor obviously knows absolutely nothing about truly understanding the responsibilities of family planning.

  6. Please let me live says says:

    Abortion is murder plain and simple.

  7. YankeeExPat says:

    Let us not forget Sherry:

    Republican Congressman Todd Akin who enlightened us that “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

    I wonder if he would tell his daughters that if they did jumping jacks immediately after sex, it would do the trick?

    Call me crazy, but I would look to Woman’s Healthcare professionals for facts and advise, as opposed to an Old Male Curmudgeon

  8. Donald Trump's Tiny Fingers says:

    Remember kids, abortion is murder but psalms 137 says it’s OK to kill babies.

  9. karma says:

    More abortions and fewer guns? How is that a turtle egg has more rights than a human being? How is that guns are the fault of people being killed, not the person shooting it?

  10. Sherry says:

    @ michael murphy, et al . . . please let’s remember ALL MEN’S responsibilities in birth control and family responsibilities. If they did, many, many abortions could be avoided and many lives would be much better served and supported!


    1. Buy and Always Wear Condoms
    2. NEVER EVER Have Sex With Another Person Against Their Will!
    3. Step Up Voluntarily and Take FULL Responsibility for Any and All Children They Create
    4. Support Women in Their Health Care Decisions

    If and when ALL men take on these kinds of responsibilities and roles, then it may just be acceptable for them to “sound off” on these kinds of issues. Until then. . . I personally feel it is inappropriate for men to be judging and commenting AND making decisions regarding laws on women’s reproductive choices!!!!!!

  11. Combination of the 2 says:

    Abortions for single mothers on public assistance should include mandatory sterilization & induction into our military for life, their only other option is to obtain gainful full time employment which would automatically remove them from the public dole.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
news service of florida

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in