No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Campaign Notes: Defacing Moorman, Excluding Ericksen, Unseating Kim Weeks

| August 25, 2011

The sign may be defaced, but Moorman, like a banned book, is getting more attention over it, not less. (© FlaglerLive)

Campaign signs are the invasive weed of every election season. They’re ugly, messy, and meaningless: they never say anything more than vote for this guy or that gal. But in local elections where most people don’t vote and most of the rest don’t know their councilman from their plumber, name-recognition plays a disproportionate role, and campaign signs are the in-your-face equivalent of TV ads in national races. All ugliness being equal, they have to be tolerated—and defended.

At the intersection of Belle Terre and 100, on the southeast corner, five signs have gone up for five of the seven candidates in the three Palm Coast City Council races. Incumbent Holsey Moorman’s sign is in the middle of the pack. Some idiot has defaced it with brown paint, what looks like a hurried, thief-in-the-night job, with a roller no less. The paint covers the Moorman part pretty well, but the “re-elect Holsey” part is still visible, as you can see in the shot above.

Moorman is obviously upset about it and has every right to be. He carries a picture of it in his mobile phone. “At first it upset me, then I got angry, now I’m back to bewilderment,” he said Wednesday evening after a campaign forum at Grand Haven. “Somebody has a distinct dislike of me, they don’t want to see me elected or whatever. I don’t know why anybody would do that. If it’s a dislike of me I’d rather they come to me and tell me to my face why they don’t like me instead of sneaking behind my back to do this.”

It happens frequently of course: one campaign will steal the signs of another, knock them down (isn’t it amazing the way wind patterns can sometimes have partisan affiliations?), smear them up with paint the way they do with words in other settings, always with the trademark cowardice of anonymity. When I made the mistake of telling Moorman’s campaign manager that it does happen all the time, he justly replied that crime happens all the time, too, but it doesn’t mean judges should excuse the criminal.

Video: George Bush’s Willie Horton Tactics
Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

In this case there’s something more disturbing than the defacing of the sign: there’s the color used to deface it. Why brown? Is the idiot a bigot, too? One does often beget the other. He may be trying to send a message about Moorman’s skin color. If the first George Bush could so cynically do it with his Willie Horton ad to scare up the white southern vote in his favor (and it worked), it would certainly not be beyond the ken of a local Lee Atwater wannabe to do the same here.

Bill McGuire is Moorman’s opponent. It would be out of character for McGuire—or for the tenor of the kind of race McGuire and Moorman have been leading so far—to have had anything to do with this: both men have comported themselves quite honorably, staying away from slimy attacks, verbal or otherwise. Moorman spoke of the defaced sign to his colleagues Tuesday morning, before the council meeting. McGuire stood to the side, waiting to have a moment with Moorman. “I told Holsey Moorman to his face at the Tuesday city council workshop when I learned  about it that morning that I regretted it, nor did I have anything to do with it,” McGuire said. He also told him that “if I were to find out who did this I would report it to the FBI as a hate crime.” McGuire (who says he’s had his own signs stolen on Old Kings Road) has no illusions about the intentions behind the defacing: “I suppose somebody thought they’d demonstrate their feelings towards blacks or people of color by doing so. I find it hard to believe that anybody could do that at probably the busiest intersection in the city. How it could be done and nobody sees it is as big a mystery to me as to why anybody would do it.”

The Moorman sign in context, at the intersection of Belle Terre and SR100. Click on the image for larger view. (© FlaglerLive)

If candidates are serious about ending this sort of juvenile vandalism, maybe they should agree from the outset that the moment a candidate’s sign is stolen or defaced, his or her opponent will immediately replace it at his expense. Whether “his people” had anything to do with it or not becomes irrelevant. The moment anyone’s vandalism becomes an expense to the campaign the vandal might be supporting, there’s less to gain and more to lose from the oldest tactic in campaigning. McGuire calls that no more than “a nice platitude” because often enough the vandals may have no horse in the race, as may well be the case here. Not to mention the disparity in war chests that may come into play (Moorman’s war chest is about eight times the size of McGuire’s).

Moorman for his part has decided to leave the sign where it is for the length of the campaign. Good for him: if anything, it might draw more attention to his name (“Re-elect Holsey” might be good enough for drive-by voters anyway), though the stupidity isn’t over by any means: When Moorman left the candidate forum at the Hilton Garden Inn Tuesday evening, where all seven candidates spoke, someone had stolen the magnets on his car. Also in daylight, in a parking lot jammed with cars.

Gated Democrats: Why Grand Haven Excluded Charlie Ericksen

The Grand Haven Democrats held a forum of their own at their clubhouse Wednesday evening. I learned about it in late morning from Charlie Ericksen, one of the candidates for mayor, who said he’d be there. Not having received an invitation, and knowing how these gated communities love their gates, I called Art Dycke about an hour or so before heading there to be sure I could get in as someone’s guest. Dycke, Palm Coast’s historian laureate, is the group’s organizer. I asked him if all the candidates would be there. He said no: just Holsey Moorman, Jason DeLorenzo and Jon Netts, the incumbent mayor.

Moorman and DeLorenzo are Democrats. Netts is Republican (a New Jersey Republican, which puts him to the left of most Democrats here). I could understand if the group was inviting just Democrats: Republican clubs do that all the time, though if Democrats did the same, they’d hardly have any candidates to speak of at most functions, Democrats in Florida having so much in common with dodos these days. (As Doug Beaven, head of the local Democratic Club, put it, “It has not been sexy to be a Democrat in Flagler County. We’re trying to bring sexy back.”) But if Netts, fresh from his clobbering of his two challengers at Tuesday’s forum, was there, why not the other two candidates? Joe Cunnane, the retired IBM manager who’s found a new career as a stand-up comedian and permanent candidate, is the third name on the ballot. All three are Republicans.

“This was a private function of Grand Haven Democrats,” Dycke said. As for Netts being the exception: “Democrats can decide he’s the best man for the job.” Well, yes, but in the letter Dycke sent to Grand Haven’s 473 registered Democrat (a surprisingly high number for Palm Coast’s highest geographical tax bracket), he’d said clearly enough: “Let us ‘know and care’ enough to vote for the candidate of your choice in the upcoming election.’” What choice?

Dan Parham did his best to live up to the t-shirt. Click on the image for larger view. (© FlaglerLive)

This is what gives me heartburn about Democrats. Here I was during the forum, leaning against a counter covered with Flagler Democrats t-shirt that said “PEACE – JOBS – LOVE” AND “EQUAL TAXATION,” there they were playing the exclusion card and discriminating at the same time. Hypocrisy isn’t my kind of liberalism. And yes, I understand: Republicans do worse. They’re masters of the gates. They don’t even acknowledge the existence of Democrats, and Republican arrogance in Florida these days, a one-party state resembling a reactionary version of Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela every day, is second only to Utah’s. That doesn’t mean Democrats should ape the gorillas.

To his credit, Dan Parham, who chairs the local Democrats executive committee (I think that’s what it is: it’s impossible to keep straight who’s over what club or committee or caucus anymore), spoke up against the exclusion at Grand Haven. “We have to give equal time,” he told the crowd of about 40. “If we don’t do that, then the state party can come down on us.”

Ericksen had literally stood against a back wall while the three sanctioned candidates spoke. Dycke went through the history of why he wasn’t allowed to speak, then gave him the floor for a short statement. “Two words,” Ericksen said. “Vote Ericksen.” That was it. To my knowledge, Ericksen, who has appeared at all Republican-only functions, has not gone out of his way to press for Democrats to be invited there.

Ironically, when the Flagler County Tea Party held its candidates’ evening last month, everyone was invited. Time for some Earl Grey.

Challenging Supervisor of Elections Kimberle Weeks: Take a Number

The race for Flagler County Supervisor of Elections promises to draw a busload of candidates—not just because of the $94,000-a-year salary and generous benefits, but because incumbent Supervisor Kimberle Weeks will be the most vulnerable of all local elected officials in 2012: her three years in the post have brought a little touch of Tripoli to Flagler County, if not Imperial Rome: it’s not a good sign when people go to a meeting of the county commission for entertainment—as one potential challenger to Weeks told me he did earlier this week—knowing that Weeks was making an appearance there. Those occasions have turned into gladiatorial spectacles almost without fail.

I kept hearing about this person and that person looking to run. I finally drew up a list and asked them in person and came up with a lot of distant maybes and only two for sure.

Pam Richardson, the realtor, is all up to it. She was the Republican candidate for the position in 2008, and polled 35 percent against Weeks’s 49 percent (Carl Laundrie was third with 15 percent, as a non-party candidate). Weeks, the story goes, stood longer at her street-corner, waving.

Editor’s Blog

Trey Corbett is also “absolutely at a point where I’ll be filing.” He’ll do so after the September primary for the Palm Coast mayor’s race. Corbett, 44, is the vice president of America’s Choice Title Company in Palm Coast. “It’s time now to do more than simply wave signs and stand on the corner and smile,” he said. He’s been involved in several campaigns, always voted, he’s putting in his time as a poll worker. He terms himself a moderate conservative and would run as a Republican. Weeks’s performance, particularly her inability to preserve the respect of the government agencies she’s been working with, is part of the reason Corbett is running, he said.

I kept hearing about Patrick Kelly, the former Flagler County Chamber chairman and host of Free For All Fridays on WNZF, preparing to run. “I’ve considered it but as of now I’ve not made a decision that that’s what I’m going to do,” Kelly said. “I’ve never said anything stronger than I’m considering it.” He too would be in the Republican column.

Same story with Matthew Wilson, the Realtor at Coquina Real Estate (he works with Barbara Revels, the county commissioner), and the only interested Democrat so far: I’ve considered it but Off and on through the entire tenure of Kimberle because of the hi-jinks going on,” Wilson said. But while the door is still open for a run, he said, “if it came down to making the decision today, it would be a no.”

There’s Herb Whitacker, also a Realtor. He challenged George Hanns on the county commission four years ago, got 48 percent to Hanns’s 52 percent. Whitacker said today he’ll either challenge Hanns again or challenge Weeks. It may depend on how redistricting goes. He’s now in Hanns’s district. But one of the three options the county commission and the school board agreed to when they narrowed their redistricting choices bumps Whitacker out of Hanns’s district. The politicians and administrators working on the plan will claim with their best imitation of Joe Isuzu that it’s never political, that they never aim to exclude a potential challenge to an incumbent (or include one: there was word that Jon Netts was interested in jumping to the county commission to run against Hanns, too, but his address still appears to be outside all three current options). But computers don’t draw boundaries.

What about Carl Laundrie, who ran four years ago? He’s the county’s communications director. He said he’s not interested in running again. The last election cost him $10,000 of his own, he’s four years older (and closer to retirement), he’s not interested in going through more upheavals.

I called Weeks to find out if she was running again. I was told she was in a meeting and would I send her an email. So I asked her by email if she intended to run. She replied within 20 minutes: “Of course, why would I not?”

Art Dycke responds:

This letter regards your August 25th story entitled, “Gated Democrats: Why Grand Haven Excluded Charlie Ericksen.”

I have been registered with the Board of Elections as a Democratic Party committeeman for district 31 (Grand Haven) since 2008. In that capacity I purchased a copy of the recent list of registered Democrats from the Board and I and other Grand Haven Democrats started to create an email list to reach as many of them as possible. Invitations to a “Meet and Greet” on August 24 were sent to this group. The bold, large-type heading stated, “GRAND HAVEN DEMOCRATS” in its first line and “MEET AND GREET” as the second line. It continued, “Please join us in a meet and greet for city council candidates: Jason DeLorenzo, Vice Mayor Holsey Moorman, Mayor Jon Netts and Flagler Democratic leaders. Take the opportunity to become knowledgeable about the 2011 elections, socialize with neighbor Democrats and invite interested friends from the Palm Coast/Flagler community.” The invitation later emphasized the necessity for early sign-up in order to arrange for an adequate set up of tables and snacks and concluded with, ”Invite friends of any political persuasion but anyone outside the community must be a guest of a Grand Haven resident.”

The Palm Coast municipal election is officially non-partisan. The selection of candidates to our “meet and greet” was not based upon their party affiliations. This was not a public forum like the one sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce for all candidates the night before our event. It was a private “meet and greet” and, to labor the point a bit, you hold a “meet and greet” to meet folks that you want to greet. Grand Haven Democrats and their guests signed up and paid to hear the candidates listed in their invitation.

Mr. Ericksen must have known all this for how else would he have known other details of the event? Mr. Tristam, you knew this before you wrote your story because I gave you a copy of the invitations at the event. You had called me while I was in the shower 10 minutes before my leaving for the event to ask if you could attend in order to compile some information about the candidates and I said, ‘yes.”  You then informed me that Mr. Ericksen was going to go to the event. Did he tell you that he was going? I expressed to you my utter surprise because he was not an invited speaker and his name was not on our list in payment for our snacks, table seating or a nametag. Neither he nor anyone else had signed up Mr. Ericksen. When he presented himself at the entry table he was clearly not even a signed-up guest and certainly not an invited speaker.

After a short wait, a Grand Haven resident took Mr. Ericksen inside the room as his guest and you came in and mingled with the guests and listened to the agenda of hearing the invited candidates and party leaders, ballot amendment discussion and audience questions. DEC chairman, Dan Parham had asked that Mr. Ericksen be given the opportunity to speak. Upon completion of the agenda items and my explanation of the circumstances that I have just written about, Mr. Ericksen was extended the opportunity to speak. Being the gentleman that he is, he said, “Vote Ericksen.” That is my side of the story regarding the August 24th event.

I take full responsibility for choosing the candidates invited to our Grand Haven Democrats “Meet and Greet” and I apologize to my fellow Democrats if this caused them any discomfort or embarrassment. Mr. Tristam, I fault your self- proclaimed “no bull” journalism when it inaccurately headlines, “Gated Democrats: Why Grand Haven Excluded Charlie Ericksen” and begins with, “The Grand Haven Democrats held a forum (AD – It was a ‘meet and greet’) of their own at their clubhouse (AD – The privately owned Grand Haven Golf Club is not “our clubhouse”) Wednesday evening. I learned about it in late morning from Charlie Ericksen,….” ( AD – AHA, That answers my previous question). The article then “slams” our gated community but does not report anything substantive about the speakers and contents of a well-attended and informative meeting.

I understood that your comment about “Democrats in Florida having so much in common with dodos these days” really referred to us being an endangered species and my last name has been misspelled countless times, but being characterized with the words “playing the exclusion card”, “discriminating” and “hypocrisy” makes me really angry.

I am a long-time fan of your writing. I like your colorful language, frequent allusions to history and your biting invective in pursuing the “bad guys.”  I just don’t like it when you write wrongfully about ME!

Thank you for your attention.

Art Dycke

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

12 Responses for “Campaign Notes: Defacing Moorman, Excluding Ericksen, Unseating Kim Weeks”

  1. Yogi says:

       /ˈbɪgət/ Show Spelled[big-uht] Show IPA
    a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

    Imagine those peace loving, tolerant, equality lovers doing that to an American citizen and candidate.

    Says a lot about Netts too. He could have refused to speak if there was this type of arrangement.

  2. palmcoaster says:

    I find it despicable that anyone smeared City Councilman Holsey Moorman’s sign in Belle Terre. That itself will reassure my vote for him. No traffic cameras in that intersection to review the potential vandals video?
    Hilton Garden Inn probably has surveillance cameras that can be reviewed on their parking area. Please Mr. Tom Grimes head of Hilton GI, review those tapes and make them available to the sheriff dept and Mr. Moorman.
    I also find it awful that Mr. Dyke (Art..?) and the Democrats of gated Grand Haven openly excluded Mr. Ericksen and maybe any other candidate from their forum!! Shame.
    If the forumwasorganized by the Democratic Party didn’t they break any laws…? Real very weird Republicals reside there in GH, aren”t they? Is the Who is Who at work.
    Patrick Kelly or anyone with any affiliation to the local Chamber of Commerce will never get my vote. We don’t need any more powerful undermining influence on our elected representatives than we currently have. Got to break these local clicks and cliches.

  3. JR says:

    If this wasn’t an editorial — and until you read 70%, it doesn’t say that it is — it would be a lousy excuse of an article. The Ad Hominem conclusions are ludicrous. That the sign defacing — a worthless, useless, thing to do to begin with — was racially motivated because the paint was a certain color — huh? My house paint is similar in color, does that mean that I’m bigoted because of my interior decorating? Yet, that question reveals an obvious answer to the first. The paint was probably chosen not for its color, but for its availability. And, the feigned surprise that democrats would live in an upscale-neighborhood is more than ludicrous, it’s laughable. The poor, loving, Democrat vs. mean, skinflint, Republican image that liberal writers try so hard to perpetuate is like chaff in the wind of reality.

  4. kmedley says:

    Sign vandalism is never acceptable, under any circumstance. I listened to the candidate forum the other night on WNZF. I’m not sure about my choice yet, but I did not agree with Eriksen’s approach with regards to taxes. The last thing Flagler County needs is four more years of a Bull in a China Shop. Weeks needs to go, but then, my reflection with regards to Weeks should not shock anyone.

  5. Liana G says:

    JR I agree with you on the paint job – white paint would have taken several coats for the letters to be concealed and the use of a roller means it was most likely left over paint from a decent size container. I doubt this person even took a tray to pour the paint into. A can of spary paint is cheaper and quicker which makes me wonder if maybe it was done by a Moorman supporter to get exactly this type of publicity. Probably done in the person’s garage too. Is it just me or does the paint job look awfully neat for a so called rush job. Just saying…

    Let’s not kid ourselves that ALL democrats are bleeding hearts. Some just ride the donkey for what it’s worth.

    – Reminds me of Democratic Senator Clay Davis from HBO ‘The Wire’

    “Mm-mmm. Twenty [gran] gets you the permits. Five is for me for bribing these downtown [bleep]. I mean, I’m the one got to risk walking up to these thieving bitches with cash in hand, right? I’m telling you, String, the people running the city nowadays, they make the last bunch look sanctified. I mean, this some shameful shit.”

  6. Johnny Taxpayer says:

    It’s a hate crime to paint a campaign sign, because the candidate is a minority? This is ridiculous. The people who constantly have to inject race into everything are the ones who have the real race issues. It is probably just as likely that some punk kid who’s never voted and knows absolutely nothing about local politics painted that sign because it was there, and because he happened to have some paint laying around as it is that there is some conspiracy to (halfway) deface a candidates sign by spending hours choosing a particular color of paint to make a point about the candidates race.

    And the statement “Ironically, when the Flagler County Tea Party held its candidates’ evening last month, everyone was invited.” Why is that so ironic? Ah, because it goes against the authors incorrect prejudice about what and who makes up the tea party???

  7. VoteEmOut says:

    I agree with Liana G’s wonder “if maybe it was done by a Moorman supporter to get exactly this type of publicity. If it was the tactic sure worked.

    Pierre did you ever think to question this premise. I must have been at a different event than you when you witnessed “fresh from his clobbering of his two challengers at Tuesday’s forum…”. While observinig that part of the discussion you must have missed Anne Martone seated next to Tom Lawrence doing her best imitation of a teleprompter for Jason DeLorenzo as he stumbled over some of the answers which he had obviously been given (who at the Chamber would do such a thing?). Wonder what Tea Party members think of the person who developed the Tea Party candidate questionaire is all in for the Government Lobbyest for Flagle Home Builders Asssociation?

  8. Layla says:

    To those posting here that you will “definitely vote for Mr. Moorman” now that his sign was defaced, you’re kidding, right?

    As long as we have this kind of thinking going on, expect more of the same kind of city government. Just when I was thinking that I liked the NPA catagory in city races, partisanship manages to rear its ugly head.

    This isn’t racism, it’s bad, old fashioned partisanship. We ALMOST made it to Election Day without any.

    Mr. Moorman, I am embarrassed and angry that your sign was defaced, but to blame that on your opposing candidate or to take personal offense at it is ridiculous. We have much more important matters here in Palm Coast to worry about.

    Slow news day?

  9. PJ says:

    It does not matter who painted it is simply wrong. so at the end of the day stick with the plan vote everyone out. Let’s start over. clean up the city manager too while were at it.

    Going forward let’s be fair and not deface a candidates sign it is really childish and sends a stupid messege.

  10. PC Citizen says:

    Fact: Mr. Moormans sign was defaced. Fact: Whoever did it is an assh–e Fact: The bantering and bickering is inflammatory, nonconstructive and a useless was of time. Hope: The police capture the individual(s) and waterboard them for the truth for all to know. Hope: Everyone stop the bs and move on.

  11. palmcoaster says:

    I like PC Citizen “water boarding” The humorous note of this mess.

  12. Layla says:

    Personally, I am wondering why if somebody wanted to deface a poster, they wouldn’t start with the candidate’s name?

    I just spent 2 hours today volunteering for a candidate at the Palm Coast Library, the 2nd day of early voting for the Mayor’s race and less than 20 people during that time were going to vote at the Library. There were MANY going to the library, but less than 10 % voted. Many had no idea there WAS an election and said they don’t “participate in these things,”

    Now this is tragic. No wonder the Chamber, Builders and Landon run roughshod over Palm Coast. Nobody even cares enough to show up to vote. You are putty in their hands.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in