No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Amendment 4: With 1.4 Million Florida Felons Banned from Voting, Voters Will Decide On Restoring Right

| October 12, 2018

voting rights

Keith Ivey, one of 1.4 million Floridians barred from voting. (NSF)

Keith Ivey has an image in his mind he can’t let go of.

It’s just a piece of paper that most people tuck into their wallets and forget.

But for the 46-year-old Ivey, the voter registration card he received nearly three decades ago — but never used — represents both hope and despair.

Ivey is one of more than 1.4 million Floridians who lost the right to vote after being convicted of felonies. And he’s one of those whose voting privilege would automatically be restored under Amendment 4, a constitutional proposal on the November ballot that’s got backers as disparate as the American Civil Liberties Union and the Koch brothers.

Ivey’s now a successful businessman. He and his father operate a used-car dealership in Jacksonville.

But, for Ivey and hundreds of thousands of others, the excitement and nonstop attention surrounding the 2018 elections punctuate their inability to participate in one of the most basic components of a democracy: casting a ballot.

“It’s very painful. It’s a huge void. It’s being voiceless. There are community leaders that you want to support or want to not support. You can’t have that voice,” Ivey told The News Service of Florida in a recent telephone conversation from Washington, D.C., where he was vacationing with his wife.

Amendment 4, heavily bankrolled by the ACLU, would automatically restore the right to vote for people who were convicted of felonies and who have completed their sentences, paid restitution and fulfilled parole or probation requirements. Murderers and sex offenders would be excluded.

Backers of the amendment estimate that about 1.4 million Floridians would have their voting rights restored, if the required 60 percent of voters approve the proposal.

The November vote on Amendment 4 comes as Gov. Rick Scott and the Florida Cabinet fight a federal judge’s ruling that said the state’s current rights-restoration system is unconstitutional.

After taking office in 2011, Scott and Attorney General Pam Bondi played key roles in changing the process to effectively make it harder for felons to get their rights restored.

Under the changes, felons must wait five or seven years before applying to have their rights restored. After applications are filed, the process can take years to complete.

The number of applications for restoration has dramatically dropped under Scott and the all-Republican Cabinet, which acts as the state’s Board of Executive Clemency.

Since the changes went into effect, Scott — whose support is required for any type of clemency to be granted — and the board have restored the rights of 3,005 of the more than 30,000 convicted felons who’ve applied, according to the Florida Commission on Offender Review. As of Oct. 1, there was a backlog of 10,275 pending applications, according to the commission.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker this year sided with Fair Elections Legal Network and the law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC in a lawsuit filed against the state on behalf of nine felons, who alleged that the state’s vote-restoration process is discriminatory.

Walker ordered the state to revamp the system, but, in a victory for Scott and the Cabinet, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in April blocked the federal judge’s order from going into effect. The appeals court hasn’t issued a final ruling in the case.

With voters already receiving mail-in ballots, organized opposition to Amendment 4 has not emerged.

But critics of the measure — including Scott and former Congressman Ron DeSantis, who’s in a heated contest with Democrat Andrew Gillum to replace the governor — maintain that the proposal treats convicted felons too leniently.

2018 Election Interviews

Flagler County Commission

Greg Hansen (Rep., Dist. 2)
Dennis McDonald (Ind., Dist. 2)
Joe Mullins (Rep., Dist. 4)
Jane Gentile-Youd (Ind., Dist. 4)

Flagler School Board

Janet McDonald (Dist. 2)
John Fischer (Dist. 2)
The Candidates on ESE

Palm Coast City Council

Jon Netts (Dist. 2)
Jack Howell(Dist. 2)
Eddie Branquinho (Dist. 4)
John Tipton IV (Dist. 4)

The Amendments

Amendment 1
Amendment 2
Amendment 3
Amendment 4
Amendment 5
Amendment 6
Amendment 9
Amendment 13

“The governor believes that in order for felons to have their rights restored, they have to demonstrate that they can live a life free of crime, show a willingness to request to have their rights restored and show restitution to the victims of their crime,” Lauren Schenone, a spokeswoman for Scott’s U.S. Senate campaign, said in an email.

DeSantis “believes in second chances,” but with a caveat, according to campaign spokesman Stephen Lawson.

“He is in favor of giving offenders an opportunity to earn their rights back; however, he believes that automatic restoration is inappropriate as recidivism is still very high. Prior offenders must show their commitment to be a law-abiding member of their community after serving their sentence before they have those rights restored,” Lawson told The News Service of Florida.

But Amendment 4 has drawn national support, with Florida one of a handful of states that have laws on the books critics say are remnants of post-Civil War Jim Crow policies designed to keep blacks from casting ballots.

Vermont-based Ben & Jerry’s has placed the Florida initiative among its top-tier 2018 election issues. The left-leaning dessert company will give away free ice cream at early voting sites throughout the state in advance of the Nov. 6 election, according to the Second Chances Campaign, an organization behind the amendment.

R&B musician John Legend recently headlined an event in Orlando to rally support for the amendment. MSNBC’s Chris Hayes recently visited the state to call attention to the proposal. And HBO host John Oliver last month made an appeal to Florida voters during a “Last Week Tonight” segment devoted to the amendment.

The amendment also has a plethora of lesser-known advocates in Florida, including Purple Heart recipient Alan Rhyelle. The Vietnam vet, who was shot through the chest in 1967 and was later diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, turned to marijuana as an alternative to highly addictive and toxic medications prescribed to treat his pain and anxiety.

After his daughter, Peaches, suffered traumatic injuries in a car accident a decade ago, Rhyelle began growing pot to provide what he considered a better alternative to the multiple prescription pain medications doctors had ordered for his bedridden daughter.

But shortly before drying cannabis was ready for Peaches’ consumption, his daughter died.

When the paramedics arrived at his house to take his daughter to the medical examiner’s office, they smelled marijuana and alerted the sheriff’s office, Rhyelle said in a recent interview.

As a result, he lost his right to vote.

“I love my country. I’ll stand up and I’ll fight if anybody was to invade our shores,” Rhyelle, a Sarasota County resident,l said.

Rhyelle, 72, said he hasn’t applied to have his rights restored because of the backlog ahead of him, but he’s signed on to promote Amendment 4 with the hope of assisting others.

“I thought, well, hey, even if I can’t get it, it will help them, and I’ll have the satisfaction of knowing I’ve done something to help somebody,” he said.

Forgiveness is another theme that resonates for backers of Amendment 4.

Karen Leicht, who was convicted of conspiracy to commit insurance fraud and served more than two years in federal prison, said a “debt, when it is paid, is paid.”

“Why can’t the state of Florida forgive us? When you have paid, and your family has paid dearly, shouldn’t you be allowed to vote?” Leicht told the News Service.

Ivey, meanwhile, is haunted by the image of that critical piece of paper, which he never put to use.

“I see my voter’s registration card in my mind, over and over again,” he said. “And now that it’s so close, I really want this.”

–Dara Kam, News Service of Florida

19 Responses for “Amendment 4: With 1.4 Million Florida Felons Banned from Voting, Voters Will Decide On Restoring Right”

  1. Agkistrodon says:

    Why not restore ALL their Constitutional rights? Why just Voting rights? They served their sentence right? I know why, I just want someone to tell me…..

  2. TPG - Voice of Truth says:

    This is a YES! These are men and women, young and older, black, white and brown, from the entire spectrum of political beliefs who have paid their debt to society. They have proven that they deserve to be fully restored to society and able to vote as would any citizen. And to those who feel that truly egregious crimes carry a lifetime ban, murderers and sex offenders are excluded from this proposed amendment.

    Vote yes on amendment 4.

  3. Brandon Cross says:

    I have a first hand account regarding this amendment.
    As it stands now… convicted felons have to petiton Court to have their rights to vote returned.
    My thought is current legislation addresses the fact that … yes… individuals whom have served his/her time incarcerated for being convicted of a Felony offense are now returned to their community. In order to again obtain the right to vote, convicted felons have to petition the courts to regain their right to vote.
    This Amendment , if passed, will allow convicted felons to have voting rights with no sense of remorse or acceptance of their crime conviction.
    Is this what citizens in this State want???
    If so then vote yes on this Ammendment… If you think convicted felons should go through a bit more secruenty then vote NO…
    Personally, I will vote NO!!!

  4. mausborn says:

    All the founding fathers were felons sentenced to death by their government. NO taxation without representation. They’ve done their time. Debt paid. Right wing criminals who start wars get the right to vote in America. Normally, what they do is run the country.

  5. 101 says:

    If someone made a mistake and served their sentence in accordance to the law, they should be allowed to vote that is the American right of freedom, they paid their dues, they should have rights also.

  6. Dave says:

    This is a no brainer! Give our families back their right to vote!! Its bad enough we are over policed, filling jails and FOR profit prisons with our brothers and sisters ,fathers and mothers.

  7. Bill says:

    I will vote NO. That being said its because IMO ALL violent Felons should be excluded. Not just murder and sex crimes.

  8. Ann Marie Marszalek says:

    I’m voting no to this. You committed a crime whether it be, grand theft, shoplifting, assault and you served your time. Doing what? Eating three meals a day, having a roof over your head, getting an education and medical. What has your victim received? How were they re-paid? Your life sucked growing up (cop-out) laws are set in place for a reason. Perhaps had you followed them you wouldn’t be in this position now. “Food for thought”.

  9. tom dooly says:

    lets see. heavily bankrolled by the ACLU; supported by the socialist democrats. tells me all i need to know. wants to change a system thats already in place to get their votes. sorry not buying it. had my experiences with ex felons they haven’t changed their spots; still in/out of jail. yes i do agree there are a few that really have changed but this amendment just wants to give them their rights back automatically. maybe we can have an amendment that makes it faster or easier for those that really have changed and prove that they deserve this right instead of just giving them this right back automatically?

  10. Hmm says:

    No thank you.

  11. Stretchem says:

    Okay Bill, some strung out opioid induced maniac walks up to you in the Golden Corral buffet line spewing out nonsense about your momma, so you pop him in the mouth, as any man with a pair would.

    Police come and arrest you for felony assault, DA prosecutes, judge and jury agree and you just got popped yourself. Because, well, freedom of speech, right? Maniac had a right to say whatever he wanted about your momma and you have no right to lay your hands on him just for speaking his mind.

    Now you’re a “violent Felon”. Nothing more than a pathetic loser of a citizen that should never and forever til you’re worm food have the rights of even the loud mouthed maniacs.

    May your God have mercy on your soul, because clearly as the laws of man are written in Florida, no one else will.

  12. Born and Raised Here says:

    It’s a protective right and assurance that if I live a productive life, and be a law abiding citizen, I have that right to choose my opportunity to participate in elections, and cast my vote. Why give this right to a felon ? It just another scheme to ease upon what it takes to be a to be a responsible, and productive citiizen.

  13. Agkistrodon says:

    Since no one will answer my question why they are ONLY worried about restoring ONE of your Constitutional rights, I WILL, IT is for VOTES solely. They could care less about YOUR rights, otherwise, as they say, “You paid your debt” you should get them all back if their argument held any MERIT. It is called PANDERING.

  14. Richard says:

    Right on – Agkistrondon- EXACTLY! I am voting NO because once you are a convicted felon you have given up a lot of your rights regardless of how long you were incarcerated. What about all of the registered Sex Offenders, etc. – should we allow them to mingle around our children anytime they choose? Of course not! Well then why the hell should they be allowed to vote? They made THEIR choice when they did the crime. If you can’t do the TIME,etc then don’t do the CRIME.

  15. flagler1 says:

    I’m with Richard voting NO

  16. Geezer says:

    1.4 Million Florida Felons

    Ponder that, if you will.

  17. Dave says:

    If you do the crime, then you pay your time, then you have your rights restored. No where in the constitution does it say once you commit a felony you lose your rights forever. DO THE CRIME,PAY THE TIME, HAVE YOUR RIGHTS RESTORED. everyone breaks the law, only some get caught. And some are falsely arrested.

  18. hawkeye says:

    Vote no

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
fcir florida center for investigative reporting
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in