No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

No Pollution Problem Along Florida Park Drive, Council Concludes, Ending Further Debate

| August 25, 2015

florida park drive clean air standards pollution

It’s relatively clean air above Florida Park Drive.

After analyzing air-quality figures at one of the city’s most heavily trafficked intersections, the Palm Coast City Council has determined that it isn’t worth pursuing further analysis along Florida Park Drive, where residents have complained of dirty and polluted air they claim is harmful to health.


“If our worst-case scenario is far better than the standard, then Florida Park, which is far from being our worst case, is even better,” Palm Coast Mayor Jon nets said, summing up what the analysis shows: pollution levels at Palm Coast Parkway and Cypress Point Parkway are well below the threshold of air quality standards that would trigger further analysis. Florida Park Drive sees much less traffic that that intersection. So air quality there is almost certain to be even better than at the city’s busiest intersection.

The matter was before the Palm Coast City Council Tuesday in the latest in a series of discussions caused by residents’ complaints about traffic on Florida Park Drive, and council member Heidi Shipley’s attempts to address those concerns. It’s been a recurring issue over the years, but Shipley, as a new council member, gave residents new impetus to press for changes again. What specific changes they are asking for, however, has bee more difficult to understand.

Last June the council ruled out changing traffic patterns on Florida Park Drive, seeing no unusually heavy traffic and only cause for unintended consequences if patterns were somehow rerouted. The council has asked for and been granted more speeding enforcement from the sheriff’s office. That hasn’t quelled complaints about the 8,000 cars that travel the road every day.

Next on the city’s attempts to address concerns was air quality. City staff gathered “base information” (in City Manager Jim Landon’s terms)  to let council members decide whether they want to take the next step, meaning deeper, and more expensive, air-quality analysis along the road.

Air quality is defined by federal Clean Air Act standards and driven by the prevalence (or absence) of certain pollutants such as ozone (or smog), lead or carbon monoxide, 75 percent of which is produced by vehicles. Air quality is influenced by topography and geography: air can be trapped in certain places, shifted by wind, rain, temperatures, and so on. (It is measured by some 200 monitoring stations in Florida.)


Nowhere near the sort of air quality that would trigger health concerns.


The National Ambient Air Quality Standard for carbon monoxide is 9 parts per million over an 8-hour average not to be exceeded more than once per year.  Measures are taken near intersections and weight for worst-case assumptions such as weather, traffic and site conditions. Estimates are based on one-hour and eight-hour concentrations of carbon monoxide. If concentrations exceed 35 parts per million for a one-hour period or 9 parts for an eight-hour period, further analysis is required.

The city took measurements at Cypress Parkway and Cypress Points in 2008 ahead of construction planned there. The highest-measured one-hour test was 9.3 parts per million, the highest recorded for an eight-hour period was 5.6 parts per million.

“So the implication for Florida Park Drive is,” Palm Coast Mayor Jon Netts said, “if we sought traffic of the same volume on Florida Park as we see at Cypress Point and Palm Coast Parkway, then we can extrapolate and say, we’re still going to be way under. The reality is, I live right there, I don’t see anything approaching Cypress Point-Palm Coast Parkway traffic.” “You’ve got two factors,” City Manager Jim Landon said. “Not even close to the volume, and you don’t have a signal that causes them to stop.”

A city analysis put it boldly: “If Worst Case intersection passes screening, no additional analysis required.  This is the case for Florida Park Drive.” (Additional analysis would have meant further screening at a cost of between $8,000 and $10,000 per pollutant.)

Landon said “it’s basically a waste of time and particularly of money to analyze it further, and expect that you’re going to get results that are worse than Palm Coast Parkway.” He added, “Even at our busiest intersection, we weren’t even close to go to that next step.”

“Recently we’ve been accused of not protecting the citizens in this way,” council member Jason DeLorenzo said, “but it should be known that all of our transportation projects, as proscribed by the DOT,w e run those screenings so we understand the impacts the new roadway is going to have on pollution, on environment and on the citizens.” If there are problems, state and federal grants require local governments benefiting from those grants to take steps to address the issues.

“The point is that we believe that there’s nothing further to do, and if you did you’d be wasting your money,” Landon said, hoping to close the discussion on Florida Park Drive. “We’ve exhausted about all our efforts.”

Download the presentation on air quality and Florida Park Drive.

Print Friendly

9 Responses for “No Pollution Problem Along Florida Park Drive, Council Concludes, Ending Further Debate”

  1. YankeeExPat says:

    In other words, you’re SOL!

  2. m&m says:

    What’s with these people? They complain about traffic and speeders and I get passed by people living there. They are a bunch of complainers that the city should ignore and stop wasting thier time on them.

  3. Joanne says:

    They choose to live there, it is a free country. No one told them they have to live on Florida Park Drive. Move out and move on. I agree too many complainers on that street, glad I do not live there , not because of the traffic, but the people that live on the street.

    • mrsdondarrian says:

      If Palm Coast is so worried about the air quality coming from car exhausts, one thing they could do is require exhaust checks of all vehicles. But, coming from polluted Atlanta (at one time 4th most ozone polluted city in the nation) after living there over 30+ years, and serving as a clean air campaign coordinator for 10 years, I can say that traffic is ‘not that bad’ along Florida Park although I tend to avoid it because of the super-low speed. Florida as a whole is a very CLEAN state as far as air pollution is concerned. And it will be cleaner once all the road construction is finished. Home building can also lead to air pollution from all the heavy gas/diesel machinery being used, but the bad ‘air’ usually clears right up after the work is done.

  4. Bob says:

    They should have known it would be a busy street before they bought the lot/house! I bought on Matanzas Woods golf course and the course closed 2 years later. My property value dropped 80% and my view went from a manicured fairway to 5 foot high weeds. Remember the code enforcement board said the course would be cut in 14 days. That was August 5th. It is now the 25th and nothing has been done so I guess the owners are paying $500 a day. Yeah right!

  5. GM2 says:

    I like being on a busy street. We have had very little problem with crime in the Florida Park North area unlike some of the side streets and light traffic areas. The only problem I have had is having to replace my mailbox 3 times in the last 12 years. Oh well, life is a series of tradeoffs.

  6. confidential says:

    Keep on nocking the city door about that mowing Bob! Developers or wealthy land owners should not ne held at different standards than we the small city dwellers tax payers are!

  7. palmcoastpioneers says:

    Florida Park Drive Residents – Are there are any readers here on ‘Flagler Live’ that reside on Florida Park Drive that would like to work on an Official State of Florida Historical MARKER ? The Honorable State of Florida Historic Preservation Officer – Alissa Slade Lotane – has told us that areas there on Florida Park Drive would be elibible for Historic Markers – ( Bridgadeer General Jose Martin Hernandez’s third Plantation Site – St. Josephs’ Plantation).
    Wouldn’t that be a great way to enhance Florida Park Drive
    Thank you very much.

  8. just me says:

    If you have lived there for 2o+ years I have some sympathy towards you BUT if not you should have foreseen living on a main road in and out of that part of town there would be a LOT of traffic.

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive
Loading

ADVERTISEMENTS

support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida

Subscribe to FlaglerLive

Get immediate notification of new stories.

Advertisement
Log in
| FlaglerLive, P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135-4263 | 386/586-0257

FlaglerLive.com