No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

For a Few Dollars More: How the News-Journal Is Hounding Its Retirees

| July 6, 2010

What retirees?

A federal agency about to be saddled with an underfunded pension plan at the Daytona Beach News-Journal is fighting to block Cox Newspapers from getting $26 million from the newspaper’s recent sale. The agency argues it should get that money instead.

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. urged a federal judge on June 24 to award it four claims totaling about $26 million from nearly $38 million in newspaper cash and property being held by the newspaper’s receiver. Atlanta-based Cox, a former minority owner of the newspaper company, contends it is entitled to nearly all of the $38 million because it is owed $154.4 million by the Davidson family, Cox’s former partner at the paper. (Cox held a 49 percent interest.)

A group of News-Journal retirees is supporting the federal pension corporation’s claims, saying the pension plan, weakened by the stock market’s sharp decline in 2008, eventually will need more money to continue payments to 1,100 present and future pensioners. The retirees also asked the judge to reinstate company-paid life insurance policies, worth $5,000 each, that were abruptly canceled for about 300 pensioners in May. The judge is scheduled to hear arguments on the issues Aug. 9.

The motions submitted to U.S. District Court Judge Antoon II in Orlando are the latest moves in a six-year legal battle between Cox and the Davidsons over control of the newspaper’s finances. Cox prevailed in most of the rulings, with Antoon deciding the Davidsons wasted millions in newspaper revenue by subsidizing nonprofit arts groups founded by the family.

When PMV, a Davidson holding company, was unable to complete a buyout of Cox’s shares to settle the fight, Judge Antoon ordered the paper sold and gave James Hopson, a Cox consultant, power to run the paper as receiver. Hopson did so for a salary of $2,000 a day. In March, Hopson sold the paper’s publishing operations for $20 million to Halifax Media, a subsidiary of Stephens Investment in Little Rock, Ark. Over the past two years, as advertising and circulation dwindled, Hopson eliminated 258 jobs, reducing staffing to 430.

The new owners, headed by Publisher Michael Redding, have continued publishing a semblant of the morning paper under the same name along with several weekly shoppers. They declined to take over the newspaper’s pension plan, and Hopson in April formally petitioned the federal insurance fund to assume responsibility for the plan as of June 30.

The federal pension agency has acknowledged negotiating with Hopson’s lawyers since October 2009, but has not announced yet when it may take over the plan. In its filing, it told the court it had intended to terminate the plan March 23, prior to the sale of the newspaper to the Redding group, but Hopson refused to execute a termination agreement with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. at that point. The early termination likely would have depleted the News-Journal Corp.’s available cash.

The termination date is a concern for retirees in the 55-64 age bracket because it establishes when they will get access to the PBGC’s health coverage tax credits, which can cover up to 80 percent of their medical insurance costs. Scores of senior workers who lost their jobs in a 2008 cutback are scheduled to lose their post-employment COBRA group coverage June 30 and will face sharply higher rates if they purchase individual policies.

The newspaper assets being fought over include about $18 million in net proceeds from the sale to Halifax Media, plus $12.8 million in spare cash. Cox also wants several real estate parcels that it estimates can be sold for $6.6 million, plus the Davidson poster-art collection, valued at about $600,000, that used to hang in News-Journal corridors and stairwells. Cox also wants any judgments that may result from any other litigation against the Davidsons, such as an ongoing dispute over money the Davidsons spent on legal fees fighting Cox.

Hopson contends the $154.4 million that Cox is owed by the Davidsons’ PMV holding company takes priority over all other claims against the newspaper’s sales proceeds. However, the PBGC, likening the newspaper’s situation to a foreclosure, said Florida law requires Hopson to pay off all other creditors, including the PBGC, before it gives the remainder to Cox.

At a minimum, the PBGC motion added, the PBGC is entitled to a share of the $12.8 million cash on hand that the paper had accumulated prior to the sale. The Davidsons and their PMV company also have filed objections to Hopson’s liquidation plan, saying it favors Cox while leaving nothing for the pension fund and some of the other creditors.

The PBGC in Washington, D.C., is supported by $2 billion a year in premiums collected from 29,000 defined-benefit pension plans and about $6 billion a year in earnings on its reserves. It currently is paying out about $4.5 billion a year to 744,000 retirees in insolvent plans. It estimates its potential long-term expense from additional pension plans in danger of defaulting could total $168 billion, triple the risk level it recorded in 2008. However, PBGC officials say they have no plans to seek a bailout from Congress.
While retirees are confident the PBGC will end up fully insuring their modest pensions – most of which are well below $1,000 a month — the sudden life insurance cancellation by Hopson has rankled them.

“For years, the company promised employees they would have a $5,000 paid-up policy when they retired,” said Thomas S. Brown, one of seven retirees who are among those intervening in the Cox vs. News-Journal lawsuit. “That promise was repeated in the severance packages the company handed out over the past two years. Then on May 1 we received a note saying the policies would expire unless we took over the premiums ourselves. It’s a pathetic way to treat people who worked for notoriously low wages for decades. For some of our elderly retirees, this tiny policy was the only coverage they had.”

The asset distribution plan submitted by Hopson served notice that Cox might also claim an unspecified amount of money from the sale of the News-Journal Center, a performing arts center, to Daytona State College. The Davidsons responded that such a claim would be unfounded because the newspaper never owned the center and Hopson himself had approved giving the college responsibility for the center’s naming rights held by the paper.
It was the $13 million naming-rights deal that touched off the war between the Davidsons and Cox. The Davidsons contended the money to place the News-Journal name on the downtown landmark was well spent because it enhanced the newspaper’s reputation in the Daytona Beach community. Cox countered it was just a ploy to plug a gap in the building’s $30 million construction financing. The center, proposed by the late Tippen Davidson, originally housed Seaside Music Theater, whose orchestra was conducted by Davidson. After Cox successfully challenged the News-Journal’s subsidy of the theater, the repertory company shut down.

Most of the information above is based on a news release prepared by a group representing News-Journal retirees in the Cox Enterprises vs. News-Journal Corp., et al. case. More details can be found on the group’s Facebook page.

Print Friendly

6 Responses for “For a Few Dollars More: How the News-Journal Is Hounding Its Retirees”

  1. Rick G says:

    Is there a more disgusting example of corporate greed and bullying than Cox Enterprises’ actions against the old News Journal?? What a shame that an excellent newspaper has to be drawn throught the mud by Hopson and his Cox buddies. Have you no shame Cox Enterprises????

  2. dlf says:

    As alway, there is more then one side to the story, the Davidsons were in part the cause of this problem we need the FACTS on what they spent ,on what and on who and why. The way I understand it the News Journal was at best a poorly run business, with a lot of SPECIAL deals going to the family and their close friends. So maybe it was not just corporate greed but private greed mixed in.

  3. Pierre Tristam says:

    dlf, the Davidsons certainly did their share of wrecking things, and the business wasn’t run the way, say, Jack Welch would have run it. But that wasn’t entirely a bad thing if profits played second fiddle to the sort of cultural ventures they were interested in, and to running the business in a slightly less bloody, less cut-throat way than business-by-shareholders demands. The matter above isn’t about that history, but about the fate of existing retirees (I’m not among them, as I wouldn’t stake a dime of my retirement on businesses I’ve worked for anymore than I would on the swindle of 401k’s).

  4. Rick G says:

    I think the pertinent point you make is that it was a private business so they did not have to divulge all of their business dealings. If it was a poorly run business why didn’t Cox excercise its discretion and sell its shares in the News Journal long before they started this mess? And what kind of “special deal” was going on when the court appointed Hopson as reciever when he was closely associated with Cox and had a vested interest in disassembling the NJ.
    All I know is that a once decent newspaper that represented views of those who don’t always get recognition is now gone due to the Cox lawsuit. Unfortunately the best thing the News Journal now has going for it is the arts builidng named for itself.

  5. dlf says:

    Pierre: are you sure profits played a second fiddle? we would both agree that status and vanity played a large role in the manner the business was run. I am not in agreement that business in general is run by a bunch of cut throat stock holders, some of the largest stock holders are unions, but I guess they are cut throat just like the rest on the owners, look at GM, the state of New York,New Jersey and California for fine examples.

  6. EVP says:

    The real slap in the face to former employees (I am one) is the more than $12 million cash accumulated during Hopson’s reign, while there were no cost of living increases and several unpaid furloughs for the poor schmucks who helped the $2,000-a-day man pad his resume. And not a single move by this man was original — he followed the lemming lead of most newspapers publishers, lockstep in jumping off the cliff. Bitter doesn’t begin to describe it.
    But the Davidsons, enabled by the Kaneys, were ultimately responsible for the debacle.

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Subscribe to FlaglerLive

Get immediate notification of new stories.

Log in
| FlaglerLive, P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135-4263 | 386/586-0257