No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

No Conflicts Resolved as Elections Supervisor Weeks Blame-Blasts County Commission

| June 21, 2010

Kimberle Weeks, the Flagler County Supervisor of Elections, early in her 120-minute appearance before the County Commission Monday. She was flanked by Russell Pizer, president of the Flagler County Democratic Club and a long-time advocate for Weeks--until Commissioner Barbara Revels requested that Pizer, who's not on Weeks' staff, sit back among the audience. The elections office is supposed to be non-partisan. (© FlaglerLive)

It was embarrassing. It was abrasive. It was absurd: Kimberle Weeks, the Flagler County Supervisor of Elections, appeared before the County Commission Monday afternoon in a meeting arranged at her request, ostensibly to resolve conflicts that undermined the first two years of her relationship with the county and prevent new conflicts in the next two. Two and a half hours and a fair amount of table-pounding later, the two sides were worse off than where they’d started as Weeks opted to use her time before the commission to replay and ratchet-up conflicts, naming names and laying blame on what amounted to a vast conspiracy intent on demolishing her.

After distributing to each commissioners a two-inch-thick binder with double-sided documents—an all-but-kitchen-sink brick of evidence to make her case—Weeks read commissioners, on their turf and to their face, a 36-point riot act that left no one in the top administration unscathed: County Administrator Craig Coffey, County Attorney Al Hadeed, Finance Director Tom Klinker, Communications Director Carl Laundrie and others all sustained attacks on their competency, credibility, honesty and many other words ending in “y.” And that was before she took on the commissioners.

“The board has been provided misinformation and been misled by its staff. I don’t know if some of the events that have taken place are political, or evidence of the board staff being incompetent, or just manipulations by the board staff to manipulate the elections process,” Weeks said, by way of introduction. “I realize we can’t change the past, but I hope we can change the future, and work more productively together.”

Milissa Holland Tries to Reason With Weeks
Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

Working together sounded like the last thing on Weeks’ mind as she proceeded to read from a typed, single-spaced statement spiked with references to coded exhibits, legal citations and underlined declarations that leveled one accusation after another. The brief storm that raged outside had nothing on the storm she brewed inside (The storm outside couldn’t compete and petered out).  All along, Weeks referred to herself in the third person, as “Supervisor Weeks,” as if the material was written about her (and for her). Weeks was paid $93,974 in 2009. County commissioners are paid $48,000 each.

Remarkably and through her 120-minute performance (Hadeed took up the first 30 minutes), Weeks not once intimated that she may in the slightest degree have contributed to so much as a misunderstanding on her part.

“What is the desired result of this,” Commissioner Barbara Revels asked at the end of the 36-point declaration. “What is your purpose?”

“That we can have a more productive method of doing business that doesn’t impede the operations of the elections office.”

“And you’re going to get there with this type of accusations?”

“How else do I get there, if you’re not aware of what’s going on and I continue to have things happen? There were 35 things I listed there that I read off that continued to happen over an 18-month period and on many of that, you were copied in emails and at no time did board members come to see me about it without my invite, nor did they call for a workshop, and it’s just been allowed to be a continuation of what’s going on.”

Weeks Takes Alan Peterson’s Patience to the Limit
Get the Flash Player to see the wordTube Media Player.

So what, exactly, is going on? Most, if not all, of the 20-month conflict over money and statutory authority doesn’t add up to much more than a hill of bean-counting. Weeks is still seeking some $4,000 in refunds from a special election last year (the one that elected John Thrasher to the state Senate). The election cost less than $100,000. She had requested $358,000 — upfront. Commissioners refused. They were stunned by the amount requested and the manner in which it was requested (without a budget amendment, without an outline of what the money was for). As it turns out, commissioners were right: Weeks never needed the majority of that money. The exaggerated request and the manner in which it was made raised red flags and informed commissioners’ caution since. The commission is required by law to exercise oversight on the budgets of constitutional officers, including the supervisor of elections.

The county paid all but that $4,000, once the state’s Division of Elections told Flagler that it would not honor the remaining charges because they weren’t directly related to the election. The county conceded that it paid some of the other bills late. Weeks isn’t satisfied. She’s also seeking an even less modest sum ($2,300) from a grant related to the Help America Vote Act—again, a few thousand dollars over an issue the commission thought it had resolved, but not to Weeks’ satisfaction.

This fall a referendum will appear on the ballot asking voters if they want to tax themselves to pay for commercial or industrial construction and enable tax incentives that might attract new businesses to the area. The ballot language may require an additional page to the actual ballot in November, costing an additional $16,000 to $20,000. Again: a routine issue that supervisors either anticipate or work out with a budget amendment if necessary. Not here. The possible additional charge is shaping into another point of contention for Weeks.

All this in a Supervisor of Elections budget approaching $800,000. Weeks says the budget is much lower than that of counties of comparable populations. Her predecessor, Peggy Rae Border, however, ran the office with near flawlessness for years, and had no issues with the commission. Weeks cited other issues—what facilities the elections office may use at election time, how much fuel costs the county reimbursed, printers not working, folding machines not being shared, insurance questions not answered as promptly as Weeks expected, and so on. But virtually all of the issues have more in common with the routine run of red tape than any malice or machinations on the county’s part—malice and machinations that would, if Weeks’ allegations were closer to the truth, require an astounding amount of energy and hours to pull off.

Conversely, commissioners left unremarked the enormous time and energy it took Weeks and her staff to put together her brick of evidence for the commission workshop—or the fact that she hired a lawyer, and paid him out of her taxpayer-funded budget, to secure legal opinions she then turned on the county government. Commissioners finally stepped in when Weeks attacked Hadeed (who began Monday’s meeting with a presentation on the law controlling how county commissions fund and oversee supervisor of elections offices) in terms indistinguishable from libelous accusations, some 25 minutes into her speech.

“This is a member of our staff. We’re not going to sit here—,” Commissioner Milissa Holland began before Weeks interrupted.

Weeks: “That’s my opinion, I’m entitled to my opinion.”

Commission Chairman George Hanns: “But we don’t need that.”

Holland: “You know what? If we ask your opinion about a member of our staff, then you can address that opinion. I would respectfully request, as you do of us, not to bring in your personal opinions to this matter. You said there were facts stated in here, we’re sitting here listening to the facts. We don’t want to hear what your opinion is, Ms. Weeks. It’s not appropriate.”

It was hardly the most contentious of an afternoon of contentions that left Commissioner Alan Peterson pounding the table a few times. Exacting with numbers, the former banker’s verbal spreadsheets couldn’t make a dent against Weeks’ barrage of rebuttals. Hanns looked at the ceiling almost as much as he looked at Weeks, and summed up the afternoon, in a conversation away from the meeting, as a no-win situation.

Weeks’ sum-up after the meeting, in reference to commissioners, who’d spent longer on this one matter than on most at any recent meeting: “They didn’t want to know what happened.”

And a major election is ahead.

Print Friendly

12 Responses for “No Conflicts Resolved as Elections Supervisor Weeks Blame-Blasts County Commission”

  1. KMedley says:

    Just look at her picture. It truly is worth a thousand words. The body language is clear. She’s biting down on her lip keeping the real words from crossing her mouth. She’s focusing laser beam looks at each of the Commissioners and thinking to herself, “do you realize who I am? I am Kimberle B. Weeks, Constitutional Officer extraordinaire. How dare you expect me to answer to you!”

    The Board does know what happened. They acknowledged they made mistakes. But errors were made on both sides and Supervisor Weeks, much like Obama, will point the finger at anybody but herself.

    I suspect the 36 point riot act was probably prepared for her and she simply did not have the wherewithall to make adjustments wherein she did not refer to herself in the third person. I’m not quite sure she knows what referring to herself in third person means.

  2. Will says:

    Since we do not have the ability to recall a constitutional officer, I’ve been told the governor is the only one who can yank the chain if one is incompetent or dishonest. And incompetence may not be enough to get rid of this disruptive and ineffective elected official in a busy election year, particularly with the governor’s eye on the oil spill in the gulf. Is that correct that the Governor is the only one who can suspend or fire a constitutional officer?

    What’s the solution? Weeks obviously missed all the classes about “getting along well with others”.
    How can she either be retrained or replaced without having to wait for the next election?

  3. Will says:

    KMedley said: ” I’m not quite sure she knows what referring to herself in third person means.”

    I’m not quite sure I know what you think it means either. Would you elaborate please?

    And why bring national politics into this? This is bad enough already!

  4. elaygee says:

    I like her! She speaks truth to power. Flagler County government and its employees are all corrupt good ole boys and girls. Holland looked like the “Hear No Evil” monkey fom the story.

  5. Weeks-"For the people" says:

    I like her too, and am glad she is speaking up. Did the commissioners not want to hear what she had to say because they didn’t want us to know what has been going on? I can’t wait to get my hands on the “brick”. It is interesting that she gave all the reasons why she came to the workshop and then they didn’t want to let her speak when it seemed like she had plenty to back up what she had to say.

  6. H. Peter Stolz says:

    This is better than any soap opera writer could dream up. A poor, defenseless, proper southern belle who only wants three times as much money as she needs, surrounded by people she knows she’s better than; Milissa the bully who always wants things only her way; George who can’t control a meeting and looks to heaven for guidance that won’t come and poor Al Hadeed and Craig Coffee – the county’s innocents. And all this taking place in the spacious surroundings of the potato palace. To outisiders this must actually be funny.

  7. KMedley says:

    Will said: ’m not quite sure I know what you think it means either. Would you elaborate please?

    And why bring national politics into this? This is bad enough already!

    Instead of saying I did this or I did that, she kept saying Supervisor Weeks did this or Supervisor Weeks did that.

    Merely making a comparison and the head of her party has the blame game and finger pointing strategy down to a tee.

  8. BW says:

    In my opinion, Weeks needs to go away. She has demonstrated nothing but incompetency and obviously has self-esteem issues that are indicative of anyone making $94,000/year and focuses most of their energy playing the ‘victim game’. It raises a lot of questions when she requests $358,000 for an election that ended up costing under $100,000. I can completely understand a 10% ‘cushion’, but to project an event costing hundreds of thousands of dollars more that it did in actuality is either incompetence or unscrupulous. Giving benefit of the doubt, I would say pure incompetence but would not rule out the latter.

    Whenever she up for re-election (and hopefully soon), I highly suggest that tax payers demand she justify her compensation concerning what she has actually improved in regards to elections in the area. I also suggest as tax payers we do not accept this finger-pointing attitude and waste of tax dollars that seems to purely go into her ‘waging cases’ against others. Quite honestly, it seems to me that the quality of performance we are receiving from her can be gotten for about half of the price she is costing the county.

  9. BW says:

    Better yet, what can be done now to have this woman removed from her position? Maybe a resignation would follow the unethical use of taxpayer dollars to hire a lawyer for unreasonable purposes when the county already has legal council.

  10. Will says:

    What is Russell Prizer doing in all this? He was ready to help Kim until Barbara Revels asked him to step aside. Why would he risk his reputation defending this train wreck?

  11. Mr. Subliminal says:

    Robert Budd Dwyer

  12. BW says:

    This article is a good reminder of what Kimble Medley (KMedley) helped bring to this county to run the elections office. Kimble always conveniently forgets to tell voters that she worked on Mrs. Weeks campaign. After anonymously and viciously slandering her boss in the Clerk Of Courts Office, Kimble quit that job after the 2008 election to go work for her candidate in the Elections Office. She quit that job after only 7 months because it was too stressful for her (she calls it a “hostile environment” like no one else has a difficult boss right?) and expected to earn unemployment . . . from voluntarily quitting! Kimble is NOT the type of candidate this county ever needs. Vote responsibly on Tuesday, August 14th.

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Subscribe to FlaglerLive

Get immediate notification of new stories.

Log in
| FlaglerLive, P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135-4263 | 386/586-0257